PICO-Orthopaedics-Global-HERO-840x840-PX.png

For complex VLUs, learn why experts kick-start progress with sNPWT

Rethink complex VLU care in a Wounds International webinar series

If you have complex, non-healing venous leg ulcers (VLUs) in your case load, there might be a way to help kick-start progress… because the recent Wounds International webinar series is now available.

Watch the video below for expert guidance from Prof Amit Gefen and Dr Marino Ciliberti on:

• Stalled wounds: Key considerations and strategies
• Wound progress: Fluid handling and wound closure
• System choice: Why they use the PICO Single Use Negative Pressure Wound Therapy System

Wounds International 2023 VLU webinar

This is the recording of the webinar form 27-06-2023

Kick-start healing for non-healing wounds… it’s possible with PICO sNPWT1,2

Target more effective wound healing for hard-to-heal wounds with PICO sNPWT*.Explore the evidence, from clinical outcomes to patient satisfaction and resource savings

PICO mode of action

Improve healing trajectories and patient freedom1,4-6… it's possible

See how PICO sNPWT MoA mat help promote wound healing, saves resources and improve patient satisfaction1,3,6-9

Contact us

Complete the form to request more information.

Citations

* Compared to baseline with standard dressings1 and vs tNPWT3
¥ n=17 This is for wounds less than three months in duration. This is wounds classified as on a healing trajectory, not necessarily 'success'

  1. Dowsett C, Hampton K, Myers D, Styche T. Use of PICO to improve clinical and economic outcomes in hard-to-heal wounds. Wounds International. 2017;8(2):52-58.
  2. Hampton J. Providing cost-effective treatment of hard-to-heal wounds in the community through use of NPWT. Community Wound Care. 2015:S14-S20.
  3. Kirsner R, Dove C, Reyzelman A, Vayser D, Jaimes H. A prospective, randomized, controlled clinical trial on the efficacy of a single-use negative pressure wound therapy system, compared to traditional negative pressure wound therapy in the treatment of chronic ulcers of the lower extremities. Wound Repair Regen. 2019;27(5):519-529. doi:10.1111/WRR.12727
  4. Hurd T. Evaluating the Costs and Benefits of Innovations in Chronic Wound Care Products and Practices. Published online 2013.
  5. Hudson DA, Adams KG, Van Huyssteen A, et al. Simplified negative pressure wound therapy: clinical evaluation of an ultraportable, no-canister system. Int Wound J. 2015;12(2):195-201. doi:10.1111/IWJ.12080
  6. Hurd T, Trueman P, Rossington A. Use of a portable, single-use negative pressure wound therapy device in home care patients with low to moderately exuding wounds: a case series. Ostomy Wound Management. 2014;60(3):30-36.
  7. Gilchrist B, Robinson M, Jaimes H. Performance, safety, and efficacy of a single use negative pressure wound therapy system for surgically closed incision sites and skin grafts: A prospective multi-centre follow-up study. Published online 2020.
  8. Smith & Nephew March 2018.Kendal PICO 7Y - pump weight and dimensions. Internal Report. DS.18.066.R.
  9. Smith & Nephew 2018.PICO 14 Pump weight and dimensions. Internal Report. RD/18/137.

Title

Text