GMC0746_PICO_14_HERO_15X30_DRESSING_FLOOR_ON_LIGHT_NO_BACKGROUND.png

What is NPWT?​

NPWT is an active therapy that applies continuous or intermittent subatmospheric pressure to the wound surface to promote healing.6 It draws out excess fluid7-11 and helps protect the wound environment.12-21 The therapy is delivered using a sealed, specialised dressing connected via a tube to an active suction pump.​

​

PICO sNPWT – Designed to fit, built to perform​

PICO single-use NPWT system (sNPWT) is designed to make negative pressure wound therapy easy to use.22 Unlike traditional NPWT, the PICO system is lightweight and portable,23-26 making it suitable for use in hospital and community settings alike.​

GMC2073-INTRODUCING PICO-RENASYS-EDGE-PUMPS.psd

How PICO sNPWT works​

The PICO sNPWT System, equipped with its 360° dressing technology2,13,14,36,38-40 provides a “pro-active therapy” to help protect13-21 and promote2,16,18-21,39 the healing process beyond the zone of injury***2,16


PICO_360_how_it_works_white.png

Above – Protect the healing process

The PICO sNPWT System protects and provides a pro-healing environment.13,36,38-39 by:

  • Removing excess fluid and inflammation41
  • Protecting wound and peri-wound area from excess fluid, locking it away18,36
  • Protecting from external contamination37


20250319_PICONHW_Flipbook5

Beyond and below – Activate the biology of healing3,15,16,39

PICO sNPWT with AIRLOCK Technology delivers negative pressure across a wider zone beyond the wound itself and activates the biology of healing across the zone of injury.3,13,15-20,30,36-37,39,41

A wider zone of therapy may help:

  • Oedema and interstitial fluid management15-16
  • Blood flow18
  • Fibroblast migration42
  • Granulation tissue formation14,39
  • Re‑epithelialisation42

PICO_beyond_and_below_stacked.png


Application and troubleshooting​

PICO sNPWT is engineered as an easy-to-use22,33 solution with straightforward troubleshooting steps to help resolve common issues and resume active therapy.​


Ordering information

The following are product ordering code to buy PICO Dressings outside of the United States. Click here to download the PDF.







Dressing sizes Fluid handling capacity PICO 7 System PICO 7 System PICO 14 System Multipack PICO 7Y device
+1 dressing +2 dressings +2 dressings 5 dressings 2 dressings
Multisite small
15 x 20 cm
Up to 135 ml* 66802010 66802000 66802040 66802020  
Multisite large
20 x 25 cm
Up to 272 ml* 66802011 66802001 66802041 66802021 66802031
9 x 15 cm Up to 44 ml* 66807749 66807754 66807757    
10 x 20 cm Up to 82 ml* 66802012 66802002 66802042 66802022  
10 x 25 cm Up to 110 ml* 66807752 66807750 66807755 66807758  
10 x 55 cm Up to 275 ml* 66807753 66807751 66807756 66807759  
10 x 30 cm Up to 137 ml* 66802013 66802003 66802043 66802023  
10 x 40 cm Up to 192 ml* 66802014 66802004 66802044 66802024  
10 x 25 cm Up to 110 ml* TBC        
15 x 15 cm Up to 110 ml* 66802015 66802005 66802045 66802025  
15 x 20 cm Up to 165 ml* 66802016 66802006 66802046 66802026  
15 x 30 cm Up to 275 ml* 66802017 66802007 66802047 66802027  
20 x 20 cm Up to 247 ml* 66802018 66802008 66802048 66802028  
25 x 25 cm Up to 440 ml* 66802019 66802009 66802049 66802029  
Size Code
10 x 12.5 cm 66801021
11.4 cm x 3.7 m 66802127

Disclaimers

*Derived from a bench testing of a PICO sNPWT Dressing remaining in place for up to 4 days on a moderately exuding wound (1.1 g/cm2/24hrs). These calculations give an indication of the amount of fluid that is expected to be managed; actual values in use may be altered by environmental conditions, such as occlusion of the dressing or incorrect positioning of port.


**The PICO sNPWT functions through a physical mode of action (MoA). All therapeutic effects described, such as reduction of biofilm, fluid removal, stimulation of lymphatic flow, and activation of cellular responses, e.g., fibroblast migration or angiogenesis, are mechanically induced through the application of uniform negative pressure and compressive forces. These effects are not the result of biological, chemical, or pharmacological interactions, and should not be interpreted as such. This information is intended to support understanding of the physical mechanisms by which the PICO System may contribute to an optimal wound healing environment.


***Derived from a bench testing of a PICO sNPWT Dressing remaining in place for up to 4 days on a moderately exuding wound (1.1 g/cm2/24hrs). These calculations give an indication of the amount of fluid that is expected to be managed; actual values in use may be altered by environmental conditions, such as occlusion of the dressing or incorrect positioning of port.


****P<0.00001; meta-analysis of 19 studies (odds ratio (OR):0.37).


Products may not be available in all markets because product availability is subject to the regulatory and/or medical practices in individual markets. Please contact your Smith+Nephew representative or distributor if you have questions about the availability of Smith+Nephew products in your area. For detailed product information, including indications for use, contraindications, precautions and warnings, please consult the product’s applicable Instructions for Use (IFU) prior to use.


The contents of this website are intended for healthcare professionals only.


Citations
  1. Evidence analysis report; EA/AWM/PICO/030/v3.​
  2. Casey C. Consistent delivery of therapeutic negative pressure levels by a single-use negative pressure wound therapy system (sNPWT)* in a wound model. Paper presented at: EWMA; 2019; Gothenburg, Sweden.​
  3. Smith+Nephew 2018. RD/18/132​
  4. Saunders C, Nherera LM, Horner A, Truman P. The incidence of surgical site complications with PICO single-use negative pressure wound therapy compared to conventional dressings when used prophylactically on closed surgical incisions: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis. BJS Open. 2021;5(1):zraa003​
  5. Dowsett C, Hampton J, Myers D, Styche T. Use of PICO◊ to improve clinical and economic outcomes in hard-to-heal wounds. Wounds International 2017;8(2):52–58. Available at: Wounds International​
  6. Capobianco CM, Zgonis T. An overview of negative pressure wound therapy for the lower extremity. Clinics in Podiatric Medicine and Surgery. 2009;26(4), 619-631.​
  7. Smith & Nephew January 2018. Summary Wound Model Report for Opal, PICO 7. Internal Report. DS.18.015.R.​
  8. Smith & Nephew 2015. A Prospective, Open, Non-Comparative, Multi-Centre Study to Evaluate the Functionality and Dressing Performance of a New Negative Pressure Enhanced Dressing (NPED) in Acute Wounds. Internal Report. CT09/02 ST865.​
  9. Payne, C., And Edwards, D., Application of the Single Use Negative Pressure Wound Therapy Device (PICO) on a Heterogeneous Group of Surgical and Traumatic Wounds. ePlasty. 2014;14:152-166.​
  10. Sharp, E. Single-use NPWT for the treatment of complex orthopaedic surgical and trauma wounds. Journal of Wound Care. 2013;22(10):S5-S9.​
  11. Stryja, J., Staffa, R., Říha, D., Stryjová, K., Nicielniková, K. [Cost-effectiveness of negative pressure wound therapy in outpatient setting]. Rozhledy v chirurgii : mesicnik Ceskoslovenske chirurgicke spolecnosti. 2015;94(8):322-328.​
  12. Hudson, D.A., Adams, K.G., Van Huyssteen, A., Martin, R., Huddleston, E.M. Simplified negative pressure wound therapy: clinical evaluation of an ultraportable, no-canister system. Int Wound J. 2015;12(2):195-201.​
  13. Smith+Nephew 2024. Assessment of the Effect of the PICO◊ 7 Single Use Negative Pressure Wound Therapy System and Conventional Dressings on Pre-Established Biofilms in vitro Using a Wound Surface Biofilm Model. Report: AWM.24.065​
  14. Smith+Nephew November 2018. The Review Of Evidence Supporting The Use Of PICO In Wounds ≥2cm In Depth. Internal Report. EO.AWM.PCS230.001.v2.​
  15. Smith & Nephew 2019. PICO Biomechanical Study. Internal Report. DS/19/211/R Smith+Nephew 2021.​
  16. PICO™ Pressure Mapping Study. Internal Report. DS/19/211/R - Part B.​
  17. Scalise A, Calamita R, Tartaglione C, et al. Improving wound healing and preventing surgical site complications of closed surgical incisions: a possible role of Incisional Negative Pressure Wound Therapy. A systematic review of the literature. Int Wound J. 2016;13:1260–1281.​
  18. Malmsjö M, Huddleston E, Martin R. Biological effects of a disposable, canisterless negative pressure wound therapy system. ePlasty. 2014;14:e15.​
  19. Xia CY, Yu AX, Qi B, et al. Analysis of blood flow and local expression of angiogenesis-associated growth factors in infected wounds treated with negative pressure wound therapy. Mol Med Rep. 2014;9(5):1749–1754.​
  20. Kilpadi DV, Cunningham MR. Evaluation of closed incision management with negative pressure wound therapy (CIM): hematoma/seroma and involvement of the lymphatic system. Wound Repair Regen. 2011;19(5):588-596.​
  21. Ma Z, Shou K, Li Z, et al. Negative pressure wound therapy promotes vessel destabilization and maturation at various stages of wound healing and thus influences wound prognosis. Exp Ther Med. 2016;11(4):1307–1317.​
  22. Hurd T, Trueman P, Rossington A. Use of a Portable, Single-use Negative Pressure Wound Therapy Device in Home Care Patients with Low to Moderately Exuding Wounds: A Case Series. Ostomy Wound Manage. 2014;60(3):30-36.​
  23. Gilchrist B, et al. Performance, safety, and efficacy of a single use negative pressure wound therapy system for surgically closed incision sites and skin grafts: A prospective multi-centre follow-up study. Paper presented at: SAWC; 2020; Virtual.​
  24. Smith+Nephew 2020. Internal Report. 2001002.​
  25. Smith+Nephew. Internal Report. RD/18/137.​
  26. Smith+Nephew 2018. Internal Report. DS.18.066.R.​
  27. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. PICO negative pressure wound dressings for closed surgical incisions (MTG43). 2019.​
  28. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. MTG review decision document. 2024.​
  29. Saunders C, Nherera LM, Horner A, Trueman P. Single-Use negative-pressure wound therapy versus conventional dressings for closed surgical incisions: systematic literature review and meta-analysis. BJS Open. 2021;0(0):1–8.​
  30. Kirsner R, Dove C, Reyzelman A, Vayser D, Jaimes H. A Prospective, Randomised, Controlled Clinical Trial on the Efficacy of a single-use Negative Pressure Wound Therapy System, compared to Traditional Negative Pressure Wound Therapy in the Treatment of Chronic Ulcers of the Lower Extremities. Wound Repair Regen. 2019;27(5):519-529.​
  31. Smith+Nephew 2021. A Prospective, Randomized, Comparative Effectiveness Study of a Single-use, Negative Pressure Wound Therapy System (PICOTM) versus a Traditional Negative Pressure Wound Therapy System (tNPWT) in the Treatment of Lower Extremity Ulcers – Dressing Application. Internal Statement. EO.AWM.PCS261.004.v1.​
  32. Karlakki SL, Hamad AK, Whittall C, et al. Incisional negative pressure wound therapy dressings (iNPWTd) in routine primary hip and knee arthroplasties: A randomised controlled trial. Bone Joint Res. 2016;5(8):328-337.​
  33. Wang E, Tang R, Walsh N, et al. Topical negative pressure therapy and compression in the management of open wounds: a multi-country clinical evaluation. Wound Practice & Research: Journal of the Australian Wound Management Association. 2017;25(1):36-40.​
  34. Smith & Nephew 2020. Internal Report. EO.AWM.PCS261.002.v2.​
  35. Smith & Nephew November 2018. The Review Of Evidence Supporting The Use Of PICO In Wounds 2cm In Depth. Internal report EO.AWM.PCS230.001.v2.​
  36. Smith & Nephew 2018. PICO 7Y Non-NPWT Wound Model Summary. Internal Report. DS.18.260.R​
  37. Smith+Nephew 2020. Bacterial barrier testing of the PICO dressing. Internal report 2001002.​
  38. Smith+Nephew 2018. Summary of routine QA testing on MVP of PICO dressings. Internal Report. DS/18/153/R​
  39. Hurd T, Gilchrist B. Single use negative pressure wound therapy (sNPWT) in the community management of chronic open wounds deeper than 2cm. Paper presented at: Symposium on Advanced Wound Care/Wound Healing Society Meeting; 2020; Abu Dhabi.​
  40. Loveluck J, Copeland, T, Hill J, Hunt A, Martin R. Biomechanical Modeling of the Forces Applied to Closed Incisions During Single-Use Negative Pressure Wound Therapy. ePlasty. 2016;16:183–195.​
  41. WUWHS Consensus document Wound Exudate effective assessment and management; 2019.​
  42. Brownhill VR, Huddleston E, Bell A, et al. Pre-Clinical Assessment of Single-Use Negative Pressure Wound Therapy During In Vivo Porcine Wound Healing. Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle). 2020;0(0):1–12. CSD.AWM.25.078​
  43. Smith+Nephew 2025. Calculation of the Theoretical Fluid Handling of PICO Dressings. Internal Report. RD/25/078

Title

Text