Global

‡ In these countries please contact our distributor

CORI Surgical System

Overview

Smarter.*1 More efficient.*1 Handheld robotics.

The most advanced and efficient*1 handheld robotic solution backed by Real Intelligence, designed to change the face of orthopaedics.

Drill Console

Smarter*1

Intelligent platform supports robotics, software, smart tools and data.

Enhanced robotic software solution that delivers:

  • Image-free, smart mapping (No CT/MRI required)
  • Real-time planning and gap assessment
  • Optimized* alignment and balance

Surgeon-controlled, handheld intelligence for a modern robotic approach.

More Efficient*1

Enhanced robotic knee workflow that saves time in the O.R.

Portable robotics designed to offer the smallest footprint in orthopaedics.

Redesigned robotic handpiece with improved ergonomics*1

  • New bur designs delivering 2X cutting volumes*1
  • 29% faster resection*1
  • Cut more in less time*1

camera front face view
Advanced tracking system (ATRACSYS): 458% faster*1 designed specifically for robotic surgery

<!--[if !supportLists]-->·       <!--[endif]-->Advanced tracking system (ATRACSYS)

458% faster*1 designed specifically for robotic surgery

Accuracy

CORI delivers the accuracy patients deserve2-5 for implant placement,10 alignment10 and bone resection,*2-10 and to help reduce procedural variation.11

Patient satisfaction

With approximately 20% of knee arthroplasty patients showing dissatisfaction,13-16 CORI Handheld Robotics improves alignment, stability and proprioception,17,18 which may help implant survivorship19 factors commonly associated with patient satisfaction.20, 21

RI.KNEE ROBOTICS applications on CORI Surgical System

RI.KNEE Robotics software delivers a surgical workflow designed to improve efficiency and usability, and further decrease the learning curve.***

Enhanced workflow provides:

Fewer registration steps

  • 72% reduction in required data point collection, with automatic landmark capture***
  • 40% reduction in workflow stages, with improved usability***22 and faster, image-free smart mapping
  • 2.5x larger data point collection area, with faster surface model generation***22
  • Single stage, patient-specific planning 

Fast image-free smart mapping

  • Automated knee model rotation eliminates the need for additional screen manipulations

  • Software indicates critical regions for collections and notifies if collection is not complete

Find out more by viewing the CORI TKA eBook and the CORI UKA eBook.


The CORI Surgical System offers the largest portfolio of compatible implants for total and partial knee arthroplasty.

Total knee implants:

JOURNEY II BCS

JOURNEY II CR

 JOURNEY II XR

Anthem

JOURNEY II BCS     JOURNEY II CR JOURNEY II XR

ANTHEM
Total Knee System

Legion portfolio
Genesis portfolio
LEGION Total Knee
System Portfolio
GENESIS II Total Knee
System Portfolio
  

 

Partial knee implants:

JII UK Stride
ZUK UNI
JOURNEY II UK STRIDE Unicondylar
Knee System****
ZUK Unicompartmental Knee


References

*compared to NAVIO◊ Surgical System.
**compared to conventional techniques
***compared to NAVIO◊ software version 6.0/6.1
****available in US only
+compared to Mako and ROSA®. Smith+Nephew 2020. Comparison of operating room footprint for robotic-assisted knee arthroplasty systems. Internal Report. EO.REC.PCS015.002.v1. 
1. Data on file with Smith+Nephew and NAVIO technical specification comparison. March 2020. Internal Report ER0488 REVB. 
2. Herry Y, Batailler C, Lording T, Servien E, Neyret P, Lustig S. Improved joint-line restitution in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty using a robotic-assisted surgical technique. Int Orthop. 2017;41:2265-2271.
3. Batailler C, White N, Ranaldi F, Neyret P, Servien E, Lustig S. Improved implant position and lower revision rate with robotic-assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. European Society of Sports Traumatology, Knee Surgery, Arthroscopy (ESS¬KA) 2018.
4. Jaramaz B, Nikou C, Casper M, Grosse S, Mitra R. Accuracy validation of semi-active robotic application for patellofemoral arthroplasty. Paper presented at: International Society for Computer Assisted Orthopaedic Surgery; June 17-20, 2015; Vancover, Canada.
5. Jaramaz B, Mitra R, Nikou C, Kung C. Technique and Accuracy Assessment of a Novel Image-Free Handheld Robot for knee Arthroplasty in Bi-Cruiciate Retaining Total Knee Replacement. EPiC Series in Health Sciences. 2018;2:98-101. K
6. Data on file Smith & Nephew. Sg2 Healthcare Intelligence: Technology guide. 2014.
7. Gregori A, Picard F, Bellemans J, Smith J, Simone A. Handheld precision sculpting tool for unicondylar knee arthroplasty. A clinical review. Abstract presented at: 15th EFORT Congress; June 4-6, 2014; London, UK.
8. Smith JR, Picard F, Lonner J, Hamlin B, Rowe P, Riches P, Deakin A. The accuracy of a robotically-controlled freehand sculpting tool for unicondylar knee arthroplasty. Congress of the International Society of Biomechanics. 4-9 August, 2013. Natal, Brazil.
9. Gustke K, Golladay G, Roche MW, Jerry G, Elson LC, Anderson CR. Increased Patient Satisfaction After Total Knee replacement using sensor-guided technology. Bone Joint J 2014;96-B:1333–8.
10. Gregori A, Picard F, Lonner J, Smith J, Jaramaz B. Accuracy of imageless robotically assisted unicondylar knee arthroplasty. Paper presented at: International Society for Computer Assisted Orthopaedic Surgery; June 17-20, 2015; Vancover, Canada.
11. Jacofsky DJ, Allen M. Robotics in arthroplasty: a comprehensive review. J Arthroplasty. 2016;31:2353-2363.
12. Banerjee S, Cherian JJ, Elmallah RK, Jauregui JJ, Pierce TP, Mont MA. Robotic-assisted knee arthroplasty. Expert review of medical devices. 2015;12(6):727-735.
13. Urish KL, Conditt M, Roche M, Rubash HE. Robotic Total Knee Arthroplasty: Surgical Assistant for a Customized Normal Kinematic Knee. Orthopedics. 2016;39(5):e822-827.
14. Nodzo SR, Carroll KM, Mayman DJ. Disposable Navigation for Total Knee Arthroplasty. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2016;45(4):240-245.
15. Abdel MP, Oussedik S, Parratte S, Lustig S, Haddad FS. Coronal alignment in total knee replacement: historical review, contemporary analysis, and future direction. Bone Joint J. 2014;96-B:857–62.
16. Roche M. Robotic-assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. The MAKO experience. Orthop Clin North Am. 2015;46:125-131.
17. Lonner JH, Moretti VM. The evolution of image-free robotic assistance in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Am J Orthop. 2016;45:249-254
18. Sharkey PF, Hozack WJ, Rothman, RH, Shastri S, Jacoby SM. Why Are Total Knee Arthroplasties Failing Today? Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research. 2002;404:7-13.
19. Stiehl JB, Komistek RD, Cloutier JM, Dennis DA. The cruciate ligaments in total knee arthroplasty: a kinematic analysis of 2 total knee arthroplasties. J Arthroplasty. 2000;15:545-550.
20. Moro-oka TA, Muenchinger M, Canciani JP, Banks SA. Comparing in vivo kinematics of anterior cruciate-retaining and posterior cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2007;15:93-99
21. 20375 V1 500197 REVA NAVIO 7 All Knees Surgical Technique 0619. 14529 V1 500095 REVC NAVIO TKA Surgical Technique 0718
22. Data on file-SP0028 REVB 199983 NAVIO 7.

How CORI Works

CORI Integrated_OR
Image-free, smart mapping:

Figure 69 Figure 71

Real-time characterization of bone and cartilage through landmark collection and point mapping, without preoperative imaging.

Enhanced robotic software solution that delivers:

  • Image-free, smart mapping (No CT/MRI required)
  • Real-time planning and gap assessment
  • Optimized* alignment and balance


Patient-specific planning:

How CORI works 2
Visualize cuts and gap balancing prior to bone preparation, to help eliminate extensive ligament releases. Customize the plan for each patient using mechanical alignment and ligament data.

Robotics-assisted bone preparation:

How CORI works 1
Handheld milling technique uses two control modes, exposure and speed control, which automatically adjust to execute patient-specific plans. 

  • The redesigned robotic handpiece provides improved ergonomics*1
  • New bur designs delivering 2X cutting volume*1
  • 29% faster resection*1
  • Cut more in less time*1
  • Advanced tracking system (ATRACSYS) is 458% faster*1 and is designed specifically for robotic surgery


Confirmation:

Upon completion, surgeons can assess the initial outcome of both long leg alignment and knee balance.

References

*compared to NAVIO◊ Surgical System.
**compared to conventional techniques
***compared to NAVIO◊ software version 6.0/6.1
****available in US only
+compared to Mako and ROSA®. Smith+Nephew 2020. Comparison of operating room footprint for robotic-assisted knee arthroplasty systems. Internal Report. EO.REC.PCS015.002.v1. 
1. Data on file with Smith+Nephew and NAVIO technical specification comparison. March 2020. Internal Report ER0488 REVB. 
2. Herry Y, Batailler C, Lording T, Servien E, Neyret P, Lustig S. Improved joint-line restitution in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty using a robotic-assisted surgical technique. Int Orthop. 2017;41:2265-2271.
3. Batailler C, White N, Ranaldi F, Neyret P, Servien E, Lustig S. Improved implant position and lower revision rate with robotic-assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. European Society of Sports Traumatology, Knee Surgery, Arthroscopy (ESS¬KA) 2018.
4. Jaramaz B, Nikou C, Casper M, Grosse S, Mitra R. Accuracy validation of semi-active robotic application for patellofemoral arthroplasty. Paper presented at: International Society for Computer Assisted Orthopaedic Surgery; June 17-20, 2015; Vancover, Canada.
5. Jaramaz B, Mitra R, Nikou C, Kung C. Technique and Accuracy Assessment of a Novel Image-Free Handheld Robot for knee Arthroplasty in Bi-Cruiciate Retaining Total Knee Replacement. EPiC Series in Health Sciences. 2018;2:98-101. K
6. Data on file Smith & Nephew. Sg2 Healthcare Intelligence: Technology guide. 2014.
7. Gregori A, Picard F, Bellemans J, Smith J, Simone A. Handheld precision sculpting tool for unicondylar knee arthroplasty. A clinical review. Abstract presented at: 15th EFORT Congress; June 4-6, 2014; London, UK.
8. Smith JR, Picard F, Lonner J, Hamlin B, Rowe P, Riches P, Deakin A. The accuracy of a robotically-controlled freehand sculpting tool for unicondylar knee arthroplasty. Congress of the International Society of Biomechanics. 4-9 August, 2013. Natal, Brazil.
9. Gustke K, Golladay G, Roche MW, Jerry G, Elson LC, Anderson CR. Increased Patient Satisfaction After Total Knee replacement using sensor-guided technology. Bone Joint J 2014;96-B:1333–8.
10. Gregori A, Picard F, Lonner J, Smith J, Jaramaz B. Accuracy of imageless robotically assisted unicondylar knee arthroplasty. Paper presented at: International Society for Computer Assisted Orthopaedic Surgery; June 17-20, 2015; Vancover, Canada.
11. Jacofsky DJ, Allen M. Robotics in arthroplasty: a comprehensive review. J Arthroplasty. 2016;31:2353-2363.
12. Banerjee S, Cherian JJ, Elmallah RK, Jauregui JJ, Pierce TP, Mont MA. Robotic-assisted knee arthroplasty. Expert review of medical devices. 2015;12(6):727-735.
13. Urish KL, Conditt M, Roche M, Rubash HE. Robotic Total Knee Arthroplasty: Surgical Assistant for a Customized Normal Kinematic Knee. Orthopedics. 2016;39(5):e822-827.
14. Nodzo SR, Carroll KM, Mayman DJ. Disposable Navigation for Total Knee Arthroplasty. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2016;45(4):240-245.
15. Abdel MP, Oussedik S, Parratte S, Lustig S, Haddad FS. Coronal alignment in total knee replacement: historical review, contemporary analysis, and future direction. Bone Joint J. 2014;96-B:857–62.
16. Roche M. Robotic-assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. The MAKO experience. Orthop Clin North Am. 2015;46:125-131.
17. Lonner JH, Moretti VM. The evolution of image-free robotic assistance in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Am J Orthop. 2016;45:249-254
18. Sharkey PF, Hozack WJ, Rothman, RH, Shastri S, Jacoby SM. Why Are Total Knee Arthroplasties Failing Today? Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research. 2002;404:7-13.
19. Stiehl JB, Komistek RD, Cloutier JM, Dennis DA. The cruciate ligaments in total knee arthroplasty: a kinematic analysis of 2 total knee arthroplasties. J Arthroplasty. 2000;15:545-550.
20. Moro-oka TA, Muenchinger M, Canciani JP, Banks SA. Comparing in vivo kinematics of anterior cruciate-retaining and posterior cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2007;15:93-99
21. 20375 V1 500197 REVA NAVIO 7 All Knees Surgical Technique 0619. 14529 V1 500095 REVC NAVIO TKA Surgical Technique 0718
22. Data on file-SP0028 REVB 199983 NAVIO 7.

CORI TKA

 

Integrated OR TKA

Using CORI◊ in total knee arthroplasty

The CORI Surgical System provides portable, handheld robotics with the smallest footprint+ in knee arthroplasty. The technology is designed to help surgeons achieve more accuracy in bone resection and alignment through intraoperative planning, smart mapping and full range-of-motion data collection, for reduced wear and higher implant survivorship.*2-10


RI.KNEE Robotics applications on CORI Surgical System
RI.KNEE Robotics software delivers a surgical workflow designed to improve efficiency and usability, and further decrease the learning curve.*** 

Image-free, smart mapping:

Figure 69 Figure 71

Real-time characterization of bone and cartilage through landmark collection and point mapping without preoperative imaging. Enhanced robotic software solution that delivers:

  • Image-free, smart mapping (No CT/MRI required)
  • Real-time planning and gap assessment
  • Optimized* alignment and balance
  • Automated knee model rotation eliminates the need for additional screen manipulations
  • Software indicates critical regions for collections and notifies if collection is not complete 

Enhanced workflow provides:

Fewer registration steps

  • 72% reduction in required data point collection, with automatic landmark capture***
  • 40% reduction in workflow stages, with improved usability***22 and faster, image-free smart mapping
  • 2.5x larger data point collection area, with faster surface model generatione***22
  • Single stage, patient-specific planning

Customizable, surgeon-controlled planning:
Customizable planning TKA

  • Size, orient and align components virtually on a 3D model
  • Confirm implant placement relative to the articulating surface
  • Adjust implant placement to balance soft-tissue throughout the full range-of-motion (UKR only)

Robotics-assisted bone preparation:

Robotics assisted bone prep
Handheld milling technique utilizes the latest innovation in milling technology, allowing surgeons to cut more in less timey,*1 while leaving a smooth finish.

  • Redesigned robotic handpiece provides improved ergonomics*1
  • New bur designs delivering 2X cutting volume*1
  • 29% faster resection*1

Find out more by viewing the CORI TKA eBook.

 

CORI Surgical System offers the largest implant portfolio in robotic-assisted TKA procedures.

Learn more about innovative implant solutions offered by Smith+Nephew.

Total knee implants:

JOURNEY II BCS

JOURNEY II CR

JOURNEY II XR

Anthem

JOURNEY II BCS     JOURNEY II CR JOURNEY II XR

ANTHEM
Total Knee System

Legion portfolio
Genesis portfolio
LEGION Total Knee
System Portfolio
GENESIS II Total Knee
System Portfolio
  

 

References

*compared to NAVIO◊ Surgical System.
**compared to conventional techniques
***compared to NAVIO◊ software version 6.0/6.1
****available in US only
+compared to Mako and ROSA®. Smith+Nephew 2020. Comparison of operating room footprint for robotic-assisted knee arthroplasty systems. Internal Report. EO.REC.PCS015.002.v1. 
1. Data on file with Smith+Nephew and NAVIO technical specification comparison. March 2020. Internal Report ER0488 REVB. 
2. Herry Y, Batailler C, Lording T, Servien E, Neyret P, Lustig S. Improved joint-line restitution in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty using a robotic-assisted surgical technique. Int Orthop. 2017;41:2265-2271.
3. Batailler C, White N, Ranaldi F, Neyret P, Servien E, Lustig S. Improved implant position and lower revision rate with robotic-assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. European Society of Sports Traumatology, Knee Surgery, Arthroscopy (ESS¬KA) 2018.
4. Jaramaz B, Nikou C, Casper M, Grosse S, Mitra R. Accuracy validation of semi-active robotic application for patellofemoral arthroplasty. Paper presented at: International Society for Computer Assisted Orthopaedic Surgery; June 17-20, 2015; Vancover, Canada.
5. Jaramaz B, Mitra R, Nikou C, Kung C. Technique and Accuracy Assessment of a Novel Image-Free Handheld Robot for knee Arthroplasty in Bi-Cruiciate Retaining Total Knee Replacement. EPiC Series in Health Sciences. 2018;2:98-101. K
6. Data on file Smith & Nephew. Sg2 Healthcare Intelligence: Technology guide. 2014.
7. Gregori A, Picard F, Bellemans J, Smith J, Simone A. Handheld precision sculpting tool for unicondylar knee arthroplasty. A clinical review. Abstract presented at: 15th EFORT Congress; June 4-6, 2014; London, UK.
8. Smith JR, Picard F, Lonner J, Hamlin B, Rowe P, Riches P, Deakin A. The accuracy of a robotically-controlled freehand sculpting tool for unicondylar knee arthroplasty. Congress of the International Society of Biomechanics. 4-9 August, 2013. Natal, Brazil.
9. Gustke K, Golladay G, Roche MW, Jerry G, Elson LC, Anderson CR. Increased Patient Satisfaction After Total Knee replacement using sensor-guided technology. Bone Joint J 2014;96-B:1333–8.
10. Gregori A, Picard F, Lonner J, Smith J, Jaramaz B. Accuracy of imageless robotically assisted unicondylar knee arthroplasty. Paper presented at: International Society for Computer Assisted Orthopaedic Surgery; June 17-20, 2015; Vancover, Canada.
11. Jacofsky DJ, Allen M. Robotics in arthroplasty: a comprehensive review. J Arthroplasty. 2016;31:2353-2363.
12. Banerjee S, Cherian JJ, Elmallah RK, Jauregui JJ, Pierce TP, Mont MA. Robotic-assisted knee arthroplasty. Expert review of medical devices. 2015;12(6):727-735.
13. Urish KL, Conditt M, Roche M, Rubash HE. Robotic Total Knee Arthroplasty: Surgical Assistant for a Customized Normal Kinematic Knee. Orthopedics. 2016;39(5):e822-827.
14. Nodzo SR, Carroll KM, Mayman DJ. Disposable Navigation for Total Knee Arthroplasty. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2016;45(4):240-245.
15. Abdel MP, Oussedik S, Parratte S, Lustig S, Haddad FS. Coronal alignment in total knee replacement: historical review, contemporary analysis, and future direction. Bone Joint J. 2014;96-B:857–62.
16. Roche M. Robotic-assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. The MAKO experience. Orthop Clin North Am. 2015;46:125-131.
17. Lonner JH, Moretti VM. The evolution of image-free robotic assistance in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Am J Orthop. 2016;45:249-254
18. Sharkey PF, Hozack WJ, Rothman, RH, Shastri S, Jacoby SM. Why Are Total Knee Arthroplasties Failing Today? Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research. 2002;404:7-13.
19. Stiehl JB, Komistek RD, Cloutier JM, Dennis DA. The cruciate ligaments in total knee arthroplasty: a kinematic analysis of 2 total knee arthroplasties. J Arthroplasty. 2000;15:545-550.
20. Moro-oka TA, Muenchinger M, Canciani JP, Banks SA. Comparing in vivo kinematics of anterior cruciate-retaining and posterior cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2007;15:93-99
21. 20375 V1 500197 REVA NAVIO 7 All Knees Surgical Technique 0619. 14529 V1 500095 REVC NAVIO TKA Surgical Technique 0718
22. Data on file-SP0028 REVB 199983 NAVIO 7.

CORI UKA

Using CORI◊ in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty

The CORI Surgical System is designed to help surgeons achieve more accuracy in bone resection and alignment through intraoperative planning, smart mapping and full range-of-motion data collection, for reduced wear and higher implant survivorship.*2-10

Image-free, Smart Mapping

  • Patient-specific anatomic and kinematic data collection
  • Provides a 3D model of patient anatomy
  • No CT, MRI or preoperative imaging
CORI smart mapping
CORI UKA 1

Customizable, surgeon-controlled planning

  • Size, orient and align components virtually on a 3D model
  • Confirm implant placement relative to the articulating surface
  • Adjust implant placement to balance soft-tissue throughout the full range-of-motion (UKR only)
    CORI UKA 3


Robotics-assisted bone preparation:

Handheld milling technique utilizes the latest innovation in milling technology, allowing surgeons to cut more in less time,*1 while leaving a smooth finish. 

  • Redesigned robotic handpiece provides improved ergonomics*1
  • New bur designs delivering 2X cutting volume*1
  • 29% faster resection*1

CORI UKA 4
 

Find out more by viewing the CORI UKA eBook.

Partial knee implants:

JII UK Stride
ZUK UNI
JOURNEY II UK STRIDE Unicondylar 
Knee System****
ZUK Unicompartmental Knee

References

*compared to NAVIO◊ Surgical System.
**compared to conventional techniques
***compared to NAVIO◊ software version 6.0/6.1
****available in US only
+compared to Mako and ROSA®. Smith+Nephew 2020. Comparison of operating room footprint for robotic-assisted knee arthroplasty systems. Internal Report. EO.REC.PCS015.002.v1. 
1. Data on file with Smith+Nephew and NAVIO technical specification comparison. March 2020. Internal Report ER0488 REVB. 
2. Herry Y, Batailler C, Lording T, Servien E, Neyret P, Lustig S. Improved joint-line restitution in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty using a robotic-assisted surgical technique. Int Orthop. 2017;41:2265-2271.
3. Batailler C, White N, Ranaldi F, Neyret P, Servien E, Lustig S. Improved implant position and lower revision rate with robotic-assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. European Society of Sports Traumatology, Knee Surgery, Arthroscopy (ESS¬KA) 2018.
4. Jaramaz B, Nikou C, Casper M, Grosse S, Mitra R. Accuracy validation of semi-active robotic application for patellofemoral arthroplasty. Paper presented at: International Society for Computer Assisted Orthopaedic Surgery; June 17-20, 2015; Vancover, Canada.
5. Jaramaz B, Mitra R, Nikou C, Kung C. Technique and Accuracy Assessment of a Novel Image-Free Handheld Robot for knee Arthroplasty in Bi-Cruiciate Retaining Total Knee Replacement. EPiC Series in Health Sciences. 2018;2:98-101. K
6. Data on file Smith & Nephew. Sg2 Healthcare Intelligence: Technology guide. 2014.
7. Gregori A, Picard F, Bellemans J, Smith J, Simone A. Handheld precision sculpting tool for unicondylar knee arthroplasty. A clinical review. Abstract presented at: 15th EFORT Congress; June 4-6, 2014; London, UK.
8. Smith JR, Picard F, Lonner J, Hamlin B, Rowe P, Riches P, Deakin A. The accuracy of a robotically-controlled freehand sculpting tool for unicondylar knee arthroplasty. Congress of the International Society of Biomechanics. 4-9 August, 2013. Natal, Brazil.
9. Gustke K, Golladay G, Roche MW, Jerry G, Elson LC, Anderson CR. Increased Patient Satisfaction After Total Knee replacement using sensor-guided technology. Bone Joint J 2014;96-B:1333–8.
10. Gregori A, Picard F, Lonner J, Smith J, Jaramaz B. Accuracy of imageless robotically assisted unicondylar knee arthroplasty. Paper presented at: International Society for Computer Assisted Orthopaedic Surgery; June 17-20, 2015; Vancover, Canada.
11. Jacofsky DJ, Allen M. Robotics in arthroplasty: a comprehensive review. J Arthroplasty. 2016;31:2353-2363.
12. Banerjee S, Cherian JJ, Elmallah RK, Jauregui JJ, Pierce TP, Mont MA. Robotic-assisted knee arthroplasty. Expert review of medical devices. 2015;12(6):727-735.
13. Urish KL, Conditt M, Roche M, Rubash HE. Robotic Total Knee Arthroplasty: Surgical Assistant for a Customized Normal Kinematic Knee. Orthopedics. 2016;39(5):e822-827.
14. Nodzo SR, Carroll KM, Mayman DJ. Disposable Navigation for Total Knee Arthroplasty. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2016;45(4):240-245.
15. Abdel MP, Oussedik S, Parratte S, Lustig S, Haddad FS. Coronal alignment in total knee replacement: historical review, contemporary analysis, and future direction. Bone Joint J. 2014;96-B:857–62.
16. Roche M. Robotic-assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. The MAKO experience. Orthop Clin North Am. 2015;46:125-131.
17. Lonner JH, Moretti VM. The evolution of image-free robotic assistance in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Am J Orthop. 2016;45:249-254
18. Sharkey PF, Hozack WJ, Rothman, RH, Shastri S, Jacoby SM. Why Are Total Knee Arthroplasties Failing Today? Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research. 2002;404:7-13.
19. Stiehl JB, Komistek RD, Cloutier JM, Dennis DA. The cruciate ligaments in total knee arthroplasty: a kinematic analysis of 2 total knee arthroplasties. J Arthroplasty. 2000;15:545-550.
20. Moro-oka TA, Muenchinger M, Canciani JP, Banks SA. Comparing in vivo kinematics of anterior cruciate-retaining and posterior cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2007;15:93-99
21. 20375 V1 500197 REVA NAVIO 7 All Knees Surgical Technique 0619. 14529 V1 500095 REVC NAVIO TKA Surgical Technique 0718
22. Data on file-SP0028 REVB 199983 NAVIO 7.