Reducir la carga de las CSQ...
ES POSIBLE
Únase a nosotros al Congreso SEECIR
Del 27 al 29 de mayo en Granada
No deje nada al azar
Al examinar el problema de las complicaciones en el sitio quirúrgico (CSQ), como las infecciones en el sitio quirúrgico (ISQ) y las dehiscencias, las tasas de prevalencia y los costos para los sistemas de salud, resaltan posibles deficiencias en las soluciones convencionales de manejo de incisiones. Es poco probable que los desafíos actuales cambien si se dejan al azar, por lo que le invitamos a descubrir el caso basado en evidencia para usar PICO TPN como parte integral de su protocolo de atención estándar.
Gestionar la incisión.
Controlar el resultado
PICO TPN es el único sistema de TPN recomendado por el NICE para el tratamiento profiláctico de las ISQ en toda una serie de especialidades quirúrgicas1 – basado en un metanálisis actualizado, reforzado por datos clínicos independientes y pruebas reales.1–6
Mecanismo de acción de PICO
La TPN posee múltiples mecanismos de acción que pueden ayudar a mejorar la velocidad, fuerza y la calidad de la cicatrización de heridas incisionales, lo que puede minimizar las complicaciones del sitio quirúrgico.7-13
Cuidado postoperatorio de incisiones quirúrgicas cerradas
Facilita la supervisión del sitio quirúrgico para detectar los signos iniciales de infección al tiempo que ayuda a mantener la humedad óptima de la herida, proteger la integridad de la piel y prevenir la contaminación bacteriana.14-18
Descubra una nueva era de innovación con RENASYS◊ EDGE TPN
La última evolución de la potente TPNt presenta una interfaz de usuario mejorada intuitividad y simplicidad, con une bomba duraderaconstruida para ofrecer un uso sin mantenimiento.*19-21
Evidencia de alta calidad
Nuestras actividades en SEECir
Referencias
*No requiere servicio anual ni mantenimiento preventivo.
1.National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. PICO negative pressure wound dressings for closed surgical incisions (MTG43). 2019.
2.National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. MTG review decision document. 2024.
3.Groenen H, et al. Incisional negative pressure wound therapy for the prevention of surgical site infection: an up-to-date meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis Lancet 2023; 62:102105.
4.National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. University Hospitals Bristol Implementation of PICO incision Management Negative Pressure Wound therapy in the high-risk Cardiac Surgery Patient Group.
5.Fleming CA, et al. Routine use of PICO dressings may reduce overall groin wound complication rates following peripheral vascular surgery J Hosp Infect 2018; 9(1):75–80.
6.Karlakki SL, et al. Incisional negative pressure wound therapy dressings (iNPWTd) in routine primary hip and knee arthroplasties: A randomised controlled trial Bone Joint Res 2016;5(8):328–37.
7.Petrosillo N, Drapeau CM, Nicastri E, Martini L, Ippolito G, Moro ML. Surgical site infections in Italian hospitals: a prospective multicenter study. BMC Infectious Diseases. 2008 Dec 1;8(1):34.
* p = 0.042; † p = 0.002; ‡ p = 0.045
8.Canonico S, Campitiello F, Della Corte A. Therapeutic possibilities of portable NPWT. Acta Vulnologica 10 (2012): 57-64.
9.Hyldig N, Birke-Sorensen H, Kruse M, Vinter C, Joergensen JS, Sorensen JA, Mogensen O, Lamont RF, Bille C. Meta-analysis of negative-pressure wound therapy for closed surgical incisions. British Journal of Surgery. 2016
Apr;103(5):477-86.
10.Loveluck J, Copeland T, Hill J, Hunt A, Martin R. Biomechanical modeling of the forces applied to closed incisions during single-use negative pressure wound therapy. ePlasty. 2016;16.
11.Malmsjö M, Huddleston E, Martin R. Biological effects of a disposable, canisterless negative pressure wound therapy system. ePlasty. 2014;14.
12.Pellino G, Sciaudone G, Candilio G, Campitiello F, Selvaggi F, Canonico S. Effects of a new pocket device for negative pressure wound therapy on surgical wounds of pacientes affected with Crohn’s disease: a pilot trial. Surgical innovation. 2014 Apr;21(2):204-12
13.Data on file reference 1102010 – Bacterial Barrier Testing (wet-wet) of PICO Dressing with a 7 day test Duration against S. marcescens.
14. O' Brien G, et al. Int Wound J. 2010;7(5):329-337.
15.Zhou S, et al. IIWCG. 2019.
16.Smith+Nephew 2018. Internal report. DS/18/368/R.
17.Smith+Nephew 2019. Internal report. MB-TM001-30-R.
18.Dobbelaere A, et al. Acta Orthop Belg. 2015;81(3):454-461.
19.Smith+Nephew 2022. Internal Report. CSD.AWM.22.071.
20.Smith+Nephew 2022. Internal Report. CSD.AWM.22.068.
21.Smith+Nephew 2022. Internal Report. CSD.AWM.22.069.
1.National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. PICO negative pressure wound dressings for closed surgical incisions (MTG43). 2019.
2.National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. MTG review decision document. 2024.
3.Groenen H, et al. Incisional negative pressure wound therapy for the prevention of surgical site infection: an up-to-date meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis Lancet 2023; 62:102105.
4.National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. University Hospitals Bristol Implementation of PICO incision Management Negative Pressure Wound therapy in the high-risk Cardiac Surgery Patient Group.
5.Fleming CA, et al. Routine use of PICO dressings may reduce overall groin wound complication rates following peripheral vascular surgery J Hosp Infect 2018; 9(1):75–80.
6.Karlakki SL, et al. Incisional negative pressure wound therapy dressings (iNPWTd) in routine primary hip and knee arthroplasties: A randomised controlled trial Bone Joint Res 2016;5(8):328–37.
7.Petrosillo N, Drapeau CM, Nicastri E, Martini L, Ippolito G, Moro ML. Surgical site infections in Italian hospitals: a prospective multicenter study. BMC Infectious Diseases. 2008 Dec 1;8(1):34.
* p = 0.042; † p = 0.002; ‡ p = 0.045
8.Canonico S, Campitiello F, Della Corte A. Therapeutic possibilities of portable NPWT. Acta Vulnologica 10 (2012): 57-64.
9.Hyldig N, Birke-Sorensen H, Kruse M, Vinter C, Joergensen JS, Sorensen JA, Mogensen O, Lamont RF, Bille C. Meta-analysis of negative-pressure wound therapy for closed surgical incisions. British Journal of Surgery. 2016
Apr;103(5):477-86.
10.Loveluck J, Copeland T, Hill J, Hunt A, Martin R. Biomechanical modeling of the forces applied to closed incisions during single-use negative pressure wound therapy. ePlasty. 2016;16.
11.Malmsjö M, Huddleston E, Martin R. Biological effects of a disposable, canisterless negative pressure wound therapy system. ePlasty. 2014;14.
12.Pellino G, Sciaudone G, Candilio G, Campitiello F, Selvaggi F, Canonico S. Effects of a new pocket device for negative pressure wound therapy on surgical wounds of pacientes affected with Crohn’s disease: a pilot trial. Surgical innovation. 2014 Apr;21(2):204-12
13.Data on file reference 1102010 – Bacterial Barrier Testing (wet-wet) of PICO Dressing with a 7 day test Duration against S. marcescens.
14. O' Brien G, et al. Int Wound J. 2010;7(5):329-337.
15.Zhou S, et al. IIWCG. 2019.
16.Smith+Nephew 2018. Internal report. DS/18/368/R.
17.Smith+Nephew 2019. Internal report. MB-TM001-30-R.
18.Dobbelaere A, et al. Acta Orthop Belg. 2015;81(3):454-461.
19.Smith+Nephew 2022. Internal Report. CSD.AWM.22.071.
20.Smith+Nephew 2022. Internal Report. CSD.AWM.22.068.
21.Smith+Nephew 2022. Internal Report. CSD.AWM.22.069.
Title
Text