PICO◊ Single Use Negative Pressure Wound Therapy System

Featuring proprietary AIRLOCK◊ Technology, PICO sNPWT has shown clinical efficacy in the treatment of closed surgical incisions and hard-to-heal wounds, with patient-centric features and the capacity to treat two incisions from one device (depending on system choice)*1-10

Product Family

Product features

PICO Mode of Action Closed Surgical Incisions

Click here to learn how the unique PICO sNPWT mode of action helps prevent surgical site complication in closed surgical incisions.

Surgical incisions

PICO sNPWT is indicated for all closed surgical incisions, including (but not limited to):*

  • Cardiothoracic surgery
  • Abdominal surgery
  • Obstetric and gynaecological surgery
  • Orthopaedic surgery
  • Breast surgery
  • Cardovascular Surgery
PICO Negative Pressure Wound Therapy Surgical Incisions

Hard-to-heal wounds

Use PICO sNPWT in the treatment of hard-to-heal chronic and acute wounds, such as:*

  • Diabetic foot ulcers
  • Venous leg ulcers
  • Surgical wound dehiscence
PICO Negative Pressure Wound Therapy Hard To Heal Wounds

Videos

Evidence and Case Studies

Disclaimer

* Wounds greater than 2cm must use a wound filler alongside PICO sNPWT. Bilateral incision management available with the PICO 7Y System only.

**Compared to the PICO 7 and PICO 1.6 Systems.

***Demonstrated in benchtop testing.

Citations

1. Hudson DA, et al. Int Wound J. 2015;12(2):195-201.

2. Smith+Nephew 2019. Internal Report. RD/18/134 V2.

3. Smith+Nephew 2017. Internal Report. DS/17/253/R.

4. Smith+Nephew 2018. Internal report EO AWM. PCS230.001 v2.

5. Saunders C, et al. BJS open. 2021 Jan;5(1):zraa003.

6. Kirsner R, et al. Wound Repair and Regeneration. 2019;27(5):519 - 529.

7. Payne C, et al. ePlasty, 14, 2014.

8.Smith+Nephew 2015. Internal Report. ST865 CT09/02.

9. Sharp E. Journal of Wound Care. 2013;22(10):S5-S9.

10. Stryja J, et al. Prolekare. 2015.

11. Gilchrist B, et al. Paper presented at: SAWC; 2020; Virtual.

12. Hurd T, et al. Ostomy Wound Manage. 2014;60(3):30-36.

13. Smith+Nephew 2018. Internal Report. RD/18/137.

14. Smith+Nephew 2018. Internal Report. DS.18.066.R.

15. Dowsett C, et al. Wounds Int, 8(2), pp.52-58

16. Galiano RD, et al. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open, 6(1)

17. Holt R, et al. British Journal of Hospital Medicine, 2015; 76(4), pp.217-223

18. Rossington A. 2015. A prospective, open, non-comparative, multicentre study to evaluate the functionality and dressing performance of a new negative pressure enhanced dressing (NPED) in acute wounds. CT09/02, May

19. Sharpe A, et al. Wounds UK. 2018;14(3):80-137.

20. Myers D, et al. Paper presented at: EWMA; 2018; Krakow.

21. Smith+Nephew 2014. Internal Report. OR-DOF/42.

22. Irwin GW, et al. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2020;8(e2667).

23. Casey C. Paper presented at: EWMA; 2019; Gothenburg, Sweden.

24. Smith+Nephew 2019. Internal Report. RD/19/006.

25. Smith+Nephew 2018. Internal Report. RD/18/132.

Title

Text

Explore