Protecting time to bond

Child birth should be positive, not uncertain

PICO-C-section-hcp-hero-image-Getty-1076139172.png

+ Understanding the burden of surgical site complications post caesarean section

In the world of obstetrics surgery, the impact of surgical site complications (SSC) and surgical site infections (SSI) after a caesarean section cannot be overstated. These complications not only affect the well-being of new mothers but also place a significant burden on our healthcare system1,2.

Did you know?

+ A mother's journey: overcoming surgical site infection

Meet Tessa, a mother who experienced the challenges of a surgical site infection (SSI) after her first caesarean section. Her profound story sheds light on the impact an SSI can have on a mother's bonding experience, highlighting the importance of prevention and care.

Tessa’s inspiring journey showcases the real power of single-use NPWT in supporting a positive birth experience. Watch the video below to follow her story.

Are you a patient?

+ Identifying at-risk patients: a crucial step in prevention

To provide the highest level of care to patients undergoing caesarean sections, a proactive approach is essential to identify those at risk of surgical site complications/infections. This assessment is not merely a step in the process; it's a vital preventive action that can make all the difference in patientoutcomes.

Why accurate risk assessment matters:

StopwatchTimely intervention: identifying at-risk patients allows for timely intervention and preventive measures6. 
 DoctorCustomized care: tailoring care to a patient's risk profile ensures a personalised approach6.
 CareBetter outcomes: accurate assessment may reduce the likelihood of SSC, contributing to better patient outcomes and satisfaction6.

Empower your surgical team with the tools and knowledge needed to make informed decisions and help protect patients from the burden of SSC/SSI.

Download our risk stratification tool (PDF)
Risk-c-section.png

+ A new standard of C-section incision care

Advancing incision care: shedding light on NPWT's effectiveness

An up to date meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis published in The Lancet™ concludes: Incisional Negative Pressure Wound Therapy (iNPWT) notably reduces the incidence of Surgical Site Infections (SSIs) with a high level of confidence12.

This discovery bolsters iNPWT's efficacy, influencing the direction of future surgical interventions and patient outcomes. This study marks a significant step forward in refining incision care practices.

™ The Lancet is a trademark of Elsevier Limited
Request your copy here
UK-PICO-Obs-page-Lancet-buble.png

+ Elevating post-operative recovery: transforming incision care practices

If around 36% of deliveries in England are C-sections 7 and data suggests 10% of patients with a BMI≥30 will develop a SSI 3 (up to 19.3% for BMI≥35 8), calculate how many bed days, nursing hours and resources are being used… not to mention the physical and emotional impact on new parents.

What if you added PICO Single-use Negative Wound Therapy to standard post-operative incision care?

PICO Single Use Negative Pressure Wound Therapy System has shown to help reduce the risk of SSI and length of hospital stay for high-risk C-section patients.*8-10


Want to know more? Get in touch

Curious about the impact that the PICO sNPWT system could potentially have on your patients' recovery journeys? In this section, we invite you to watch our Mechanism of Action video. 


Click here to access more resources Find out why NICE supports the use of PICO sNPWT

+ Empowering clinicians: access valuable resources

We are committed to equipping clinicians with the latest resources and evidence to aid in clinical practice and provide the best possible care. Explore our comprehensive collection of resources and information to enhance your knowledge, decision-making and clinical practice.

These resources are designed to empower you with the latest insights and information, ensuring that you have the tools you need to excel in your field and deliver optimum care to your patients. 

Want to know more?

Get in touch with us. We're here to help.
For more information on surgical site complications post-caesarean section and the impact it may pose to your department, simply fill out the form below. Our team is here to provide you with the support and information you need to identify patients at-risk of developing SSC.

Get in touch
Disclamers and citations

*Compared to conventional dressings/standard care.
**Open-label, pragmatic, randomised study. PICO sNPWT (n=432) vs standard dressings (n=444),p=0.007.

 

For detailed product information, including indications for use, contraindications, precautions andwarnings, please consult the product’s applicable Instructions for Use (IFU) prior to use.

 

Citations:

  1. Bullough L, Burns S, Timmons J, Truman P, Megginson S. Reducing c-section woundcomplications. The Clinical Services Journal. 2015:2-6.
  2. Jenks P, Laurent M, et al. Clinical and economic burden of surgical site infections (SSI) andpredicted financial consequences of elimination of SSI from an English hospital. J HospInfect.2014;86(1):24-33.
  3. Wloch C et al. Risk factors for surgical infections following C-section. BJOG.2012;119(11):1324-33
  4. Bullough L and Wilkinson D. Changing wound care protocols to reduce post-operativecaesarean section complications. Presented at Wounds UK, Harrogate, 2012
  5. Hoff CE, Movva N, Rosen Vollmar AK, Pérez-Escamilla R. Impact of Maternal Anxiety onBreastfeeding Outcomes: A Systematic Review. Adv Nutr. 2019 Sep 1;10(5):816-826. doi:10.1093/advances/nmy132. PMID: 31079143; PMCID: PMC6743815.
  6. NHS England, 2023. Earlier screening, risk assessment and health optimisation inperioperative pathways: guide for providers and integrated care boards. Available at:https://www.england.nhs.uk/long-read/earlier-screening-risk-assessment-and-healthoptimisation-in-perioperative-pathways/ [Last accessed: Sept 2023]
  7. NHS Maternity Statistics, 2021-22: HES Provider Level Analysis. Available at:https://digital.nhs.uk/data-and-information/publications/statistical/nhs-maternitystatistics/2021-22 [Last accessed: Aug 2023]
  8. Hyldig N, Joergensen JS, Wu C, et al. Cost-effectiveness of incisional negative pressure wound therapy compared with standard care after caesarean section in obese women: a trial-based economic evaluation. BJOG. 2019;126(5):619-627.
  9. Hyldig N, Vinter CA, Kruse M, et al. Prophylactic incisional negative pressure wound therapy reduces the risk of surgical site infection after caesarean section in obese women: A pragmatic randomised clinical trial. BJOG. 2019;126:628-635.
  10. Saunders C, et al. A single use negative pressure system reduces surgical site complicationscompared with conventional dressings in closed surgical incisions: a systematic literaturereview with meta-analysis. Poster presented at the European Wound ManagementAssociation annual meeting, June 5-7, 2019, Gothenburg, Sweden.
  11. NICE (2019) PICO negative pressure wound dressings for closed surgical incisions [online]accessible from: https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/mtg43. [Last accessed: Sept 2023]
  12. Groenen H, Jalalzadeh H, Buis DR, et al. eClinicalMedicine (part of The Lancet group). 2023;62:102105

Title

Text

Explore