Global

‡ In these countries please contact our distributor

Comparison of two dressings...

This information is intended for Healthcare Professionals only.

 

Martini L, Reali UM, Borgognoni L, Andriessen A. Comparison of two dressings in the management of partial-thickness donor sites. Journal of Wound Care 1999; 8(9): 457-60.

 

Type of Study: Comparative Study

 

Type of Wound: Surgical/Post-Surgical Wounds

 

Abstract
Comparative study conducted in 50 patients over 18 years of age. Each patient acted as their own control. The study compared the performance of Allevyn* Adhesive with a paraffin gauze dressing in the management of partial-thickness skin-graft donor site wounds.


Treatment lasted for 7 days, until re-epithelialisation, an adverse reaction or patient withdrawal. Forty-four patients were evaluated in the analysis.


Outcome measures were time to complete epithelialisation, ease of dressing removal, pain on removal and appearance of the wound bed.


Key Findings

  • Allevyn Adhesive demonstrated a significantly faster healing time (p<10-6) and enhanced patient comfort.>
  • At day 7, the pain associated with the paraffin dressing during removal was described as unbearable, whereas patients reported slight or no pain upon removal with Allevyn Adhesive.
  • Complete epithelialisation with Allevyn Adhesive was achieved in 93% of patients (versus 36%) by the end of the study period (day 7). Mean time to epithelialisation was 5.64 days, versus 9.0 days with the paraffin dressing.
  • Allevyn Adhesive is easy to shape, has a high absorption capacity. It reduces the risk of leakage, and does not stick to the wound.
  • Allevyn Adhesive provided a clean moist wound environment, encouraging faster and more comfortable wound healing.